Whether or not a brokered convention is possible, it is not acceptable. It doesn't matter if you're pro Obama or pro Clinton; I think everyone here realizes that the only way democrats can win 08 after a brokered convention is by nominating al gore. He would be the only person with both the name recognition and the favorables to wage a TWO MONTH campaign for the Whitehouse. A battered Hillary or Obama, even with both of them on the same ticket would likely lose. Looking at the calendar, we see that after March 4th, there is only the Wyoming caucus, Mississippi primary (both Obama states most likely) then a month and eleven days until Pennsylvania. After, a few more states, totaling about 500 delegates vote over the next month. This is far too much of a head start for McCain. A one month head start? Fine, he wants the war to last 100 years, and we have excitement in the party, we can survive that, but not knowing until June, or even august? No. After march fourth, the candidates and DNC need to access who has the popular vote, money, delegate count, states, both number and region, and momentum then apply all the pressure they have to get the loser to withdraw. That loser would almost be guaranteed the veep slot out of necessity, things have become far too divided, and while there is certainly animosity between the two candidates, they wouldn't be the first prez-veep ticket with problems. Gore/Lieberman, kerry-edwards, Reagan-bush nixon-agnew ike-nixon. It might be awkward, but would help a lot more than hurt. What I'm, basically saying is, both to the blogosphere and the DNC (though I hold no delusions that they're listening) fix this mess!!!!!! DNC you let the states front load this and we're screwed, fix this!
|
|
|
Permalink :: 18 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.